National Service Framework
Have you ever asked a question like this?
What are the national standards for services for people with MND?
How can I have a say in national policy?
That's what BUILD is trying to find out.
Let's start with the National Service Framework - here's how the Government
explain it (follow the links to find out more):
|
On
28 February 2001 Secretary of State, Alan Milburn, said "Today
I can announce that we will develop a new National Service Framework
for Long Term Health Conditions. The NSF will have a particular
focus on the needs of people with neurological disease and brain
and spinal injury.
It will include services for people with
epilepsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease and other similar
conditions. The NSF will overcome the lottery in care and ensure
health and social services work together in all parts of the country
to provide the right level of care and treatment for people with
long term health conditions."
The Department has just started scoping the
NSF's extent and coverage, and we'll be talking about that to a
wide range of interested parties including the voluntary sector,
patient's organisations and the NHS. Once this process is completed,
an external reference group will be set up, bringing together health
and social care professionals and service users and carers. The
current plan is that the NSF will be published in 2004 for implementation
in 2005.
|
What are National Service Frameworks?
|
National
Service Frameworks:
- set national standards and define service
models for a defined service or care group;
- put in place strategies to support implementation;
and
- establish performance milestones against
which progress within an agreed time-scale will be measured.
|
What's happened so far?
|
Report
of the Scoping Event, 12 November 2001
INTRODUCTION
1 The NSF project team organised a one-day
facilitated workshop on 12 November. Its aim was to begin to identify
the top ten key issues the NSF should address to improve the quality
of life for people with neurological and other long-term conditions.
This was done through a mixture of group and plenary work.
2. A wide cross-section of stakeholders attended,
including representatives from the voluntary sector, health and
social care professional, users, carers and officials from other
government departments (see Annex 1).
3. The Department of Health Minister, Jacqui
Smith, and Sarah Mullally, the Chief Nursing Officer who is the
Departmental Director responsible for this NSF, addressed the meeting.
A key theme of both their speeches was the importance of user and
carer involvement in the development and implementation of the NSF.
Another was the need for a genuinely open, inclusive and constructive
consultation process that really listened to the views of stakeholders.
|
What's been said so far?
|
KEY
THEMES, SOLUTIONS AND EARLY EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS
SERVICE USERS
Integrated health care and integrated health
and social care
1. A key issue for service users was a need
for more integration within the various levels and between the various
parts of the NHS and also for better integration between health
and social services, putting the user at the centre of decisions
about their care.
The expert patient
2. Professionals needed to recognise users'
skills and expertise in understanding and managing their condition
and adopt the principles of the Expert Patient Report where suitable.
These include the concepts of empowerment, choice, consent and dialogue.
However, adopting these principles would not be possible or desirable
in all cases and people not acting as expert patients needed protection
within and access to high-quality services. In all cases, self-management
should complement, not replace other services and there needed to
be a continued sharing of responsibilities. Developing new and improving
existing 24-hour community nursing service would help people remain
at home.
Transition issues
3. Service users wanted a seamless service
with continuity of care. The care needed be individual and flexible
to cope with transition issues. These issues included:-
- from diagnosis to living in the community
with a long term condition
- age-related issues as people moved from
paediatric - adult - older persons' services;
- different patterns of illness e.g. relapsing/remitting,
fluctuating, progressive and terminal;
- different service needs and care pathways:
acute phases - rehabilitation - community and back again;
- different personal circumstances: e.g.
from employment to unemployment; from independence to dependence;
parenthood, and bereavement including death of a carer.
Single assessment procedures and key workers
5. An interdisciplinary approach:-
- single holistic needs assessment procedure
based on quality of life looking at medical, psychological and
social needs with different pathways for different phases of the
condition e.g. : acute, stable, fluctuating and degenerative.
Need for clinical guidelines and protocols to help with this;
- the right support mechanisms for service
users and carers: case manager, voluntary organisations, specialist
nurses, health and social care professionals with well-defined
and understood roles and responsibilities; respite care and regular
short breaks;
- comprehensive care plan before discharge;
- appointment of a key worker responsible
for co-ordinating care (see para 14).
Access to services
7. Equitable access to a flexible range of
appropriate services including: -
- transparent referral practices;
- early, accurate diagnosis with sensitive
communication with service users and their carers;
- appropriate in-patient care including
specialist services;
- appropriate out-patient care;
- specialised and community rehabilitation
services e.g. physiotherapy, hydrotherapy and orthotics (and access
to more than one episode of rehabilitation);
- psychological, neuro-psychological, psychiatric,
counselling and psychosexual and relationship services;
- complex packages of home-care with professional
advice and management of issues like gastric feeding and pain-management;
- palliative care (extend role of hospices
to help those with chronic conditions rather than concentrating
so much on people with terminal cancer).
Symptom management
7. Help with a range of common symptoms including:-
- incontinence;
- chronic pain management;
- fatigue;
- depression;
- cognitive problems.
- mobility problems and movement disorders;
- speech and language problems;
- spasticity;
- sensory problems.
Assistive devices and community equipment
8. Equitable access to good quality housing
adaptations and assistive devices (community equipment) that are
properly maintained to agreed minimum standards and securely financed
e.g.:-
- orthotics;
- wheelchairs;
- communications aids;
- 24-hour postural management.
9. Improved community equipment services
including:-
- transparency of decision-making process
and needs-assessment;
- involve service users, carers and service
providers on equal basis with possible input from the Health and
Safety Executive;
- WHICH? Guide to encourage consumer choice;
- identified gatekeepers responsible for
providing equipment e.g. an occupational therapist;
- fast database of assitive technology;
- register of equipment users with a review
mechanism to see if equipment meets users' needs: outcome measures
of service-user satisfaction;
- maintenance: companies to provide warranty
under contract;
- develop consumer relationship with Medical
Devices Agency;
- enable better use of Direct Payments
for equipment;
- expand Patient Advocacy Liaison Service
(PALS) to cover equipment, working with social services.
- Welfare, housing, work, transport and
leisure
10. Equal access to:
- welfare/benefits and other financial
advice;
- suitable housing
- employment and vocational training;
- transport and leisure services: outreach
transport for geographically isolated.
Review and self-referral to specialist
services
11. Mechanisms that allow:-
- regular invitations for case reviews
from the statutory agencies for service-users, explaining the
reason for the review and what help is available i.e. "the
case does not close". These reviews could be used as a means
of "secondary" prevention: preventing further unnecessary
damage, slowing degeneration, prevention of infection and contractures
caused by immobility or lack of maintenance treatments and therapies;
- an in-built review that user/patient
can initiate;
- self-referral to specialist services
e.g. physiotherapists to reduce delays to patients and primary
care
|
What about carers?
|
12.
The key issues were:-
- service users' needs should be assessed
without assuming informal carer help;
- anticipatory, pro-active care and support
for carers to prevent them "going under", particularly
helping with the stains imposed on relationships by the long term
illness;
- rapid responses to changes in carers'
circumstances e.g. illness, unemployment, divorce or death;
- information about services;
- increased use of planned rather than
acute respite care and regular short-term breaks so that care
is shared. This may need an increase in respite beds in nursing
homes and hospices.
- recognition of the needs of ageing carers
and the heavy burden of care; need to increase skill and independence
of users;
- recognition that many carers have long
term conditions themselves
|
How can I have my say?
If you would like to respond to some of these points, to add your comments
and your experiences, why not go to the BUILD
forum.
Return to the Campaining index
|